I note that everything the government states is 'the average consumer' so are they expecting all to be reduced to 'average'. The whole FM radio concept was not born from average but an attempt at a new better standard and it certainly did that, personally I don't think the government should take any part in broadcasting standards but they do simply by charging for spectrum.
Equally so I think their decision is based solely on financial reward with no mention of sonic performance. Now the claim that a better signal will enhance the perceived sound is complete nonsense, however good the reception is it will never improve the bit rate.
I had one of the first DAB radios a Pure, one of the best at the time but I could never listen for long and gave it away in the end, admitted some channels were better than others but none were up to FM standard.
Whatever happened to stereo digital broadcast in the AM bands, sounded interesting a few years ago but I've heard nothing since, why did NICAM never make headlines as a broadcast medium as I've never heard any complaints about it's quality, OK it is compressed but in a lossless way and certainly not to the point of MP3 or DAB.
Are we all stuck in a trench, TV with NICAM, portable audio MP3, radio DAB, in many ways AM radio is better than many, it's only restriction being the bandwidth allocated to it, or single sideband reception that is used the world over for shortwave communication and requires only half the bandwidth.
Maybe a 'spread spectrum' system as used by the worlds army’s.
Many avenues exist, John…