When I read the opening of this 32in LCD review I was expecting a verdict to comment on the low-end versus high-end products, in terms of value for money throughout the range. There is no doubt that the Philips was the clear winner here, and worth the extra, but what about second place? Is the Sony also worth saving for in prefereecne to the Panasonic based on goodies and performance, or does the 300 quid difference show us that sometimes a low-end product is still a better option, despite what the salesmen tell us?